Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2017 17:33:01 GMT -8
Tampa trades:
Chris Archer SP/TB 19.1m(21)
Cleveland trades:
Javier Baez 2B/SS/3B/CHC 19.1m(21-22p)
i agree to this trade. I believe Archer is still a top end SP, but I am really high on Baez potential in multiple categories as well as his positional eligibility and youth. I tried to acquire him in FA but lost out. I also feel I still have the makings of a strong rotation with Gray, Walker, Snell, and DeLeon. The money being equal also makes sense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2017 17:53:23 GMT -8
I agree to this trade. I think adding Archer to my rotation will shore up my SP depth and negate some of the injury risk presented by some of my other SPs. Randy and I seemed to be highest on Baez, as reflected during FA bidding, so I think we value him on the same level. While I like Baez outlook, I think my hitting will be ok for the time being. As stated above, the equal money also makes sense.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2017 17:59:47 GMT -8
Rate Scale 10?
Trades not veto material. Tampa wants Baez, Cleveland wants pitching to help win. Seems legit. Hard to really weigh a trade this early. Financially it's obviously good to go.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2017 18:54:12 GMT -8
Agreed, no problem (give it a Zero)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2017 19:41:02 GMT -8
Yay a trade!
I'll give it a 0
Young middle infielders are more valuable then arms, but Baez's contract is problematic. However, it makes sense given the bidding war that both these guys value Baez highly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2017 20:03:07 GMT -8
Makes sense for both sides, both guys have their ups and downs. I'd say a very small win for Tampa, but a pretty fairly-balanced deal overall.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 4:53:39 GMT -8
0, both had clear reasons for making the move.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Cubs (Curtis) on Mar 19, 2017 5:26:24 GMT -8
In case anyone is waiting for the commish to chime in I will wait at least a day before processing for all trades to let owners post their thoughts.
I will not veto trades unless collusion is clear.
My intent is to allow for conversations to occur regarding players trade values - kind of a barometer to help us all wrap our heads around the different values that players carry in this league versus others. Contracts and age can alter a player's value significantly from the internet's redraft-based consensus.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 7:53:22 GMT -8
0 for me...both owners know why they are doing this deal and it seems like a win/win
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 7:55:22 GMT -8
0 for me as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 14:31:15 GMT -8
0
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2017 23:15:09 GMT -8
0 for me as well, about as fair as they come.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2017 11:20:01 GMT -8
0
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2017 13:09:40 GMT -8
0
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2017 6:33:11 GMT -8
Trade processed
|
|
